Is there a plan to support PIC18F types for the next versions?
Quote from Rio on December 5, 2024, 2:15 pmThat would be really great, because they are widely used and differ in architecture from PIC16F.
That would be really great, because they are widely used and differ in architecture from PIC16F.
Quote from francisco4ever on December 8, 2024, 4:35 amThank you for your words. If you need to simulate the PIC18F, download the version of SimulIDE_0.4.15-SR10 for your system. I don't know why Arcachofo is not interested in implementing PIC18 in SimulIDE 1.1.0-SR1. God bless you...
Thank you for your words. If you need to simulate the PIC18F, download the version of SimulIDE_0.4.15-SR10 for your system. I don't know why Arcachofo is not interested in implementing PIC18 in SimulIDE 1.1.0-SR1. God bless you...
Quote from Rio on December 8, 2024, 10:19 amInteresting and thank you for your advice.
Yes, it's a pity that only the PIC16F architecture has found its way into the final release. There must have been a reason why Arcachofo left this out. On the other hand, he already gives you the correct locations for implementation in the Git sources (https://simulide.com/p/forum/topic/ajuda-para-implementar-pic18f/). Maybe the author himself can say something about why it was handled this way, or are there existing sources for 0.4.15 to be able to use them directly? There is no other branch in Git that references it. A little more detail would be very helpful.
Best regards, rio
Interesting and thank you for your advice.
Yes, it's a pity that only the PIC16F architecture has found its way into the final release. There must have been a reason why Arcachofo left this out. On the other hand, he already gives you the correct locations for implementation in the Git sources (https://simulide.com/p/forum/topic/ajuda-para-implementar-pic18f/). Maybe the author himself can say something about why it was handled this way, or are there existing sources for 0.4.15 to be able to use them directly? There is no other branch in Git that references it. A little more detail would be very helpful.
Best regards, rio
Quote from arcachofo on December 8, 2024, 3:09 pmYes, it's a pity that nobody is willing to put 500 to 1000 hours of work to implement PIC18F.
Sources from 0.4.15 are not useful in versions 1.x.x
Yes, it's a pity that nobody is willing to put 500 to 1000 hours of work to implement PIC18F.
Sources from 0.4.15 are not useful in versions 1.x.x