Hardcoded gcc when compiling for Mac
Quote from TomaSajt on December 14, 2023, 9:12 pmSaw that there was a hardcoded path added for gcc to the build steps for when building for MacOS in this commit:
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~arcachofo/simulide/trunk/revision/1158/SimulIDE.proCould I know why this was done? Did the program not work properly with clang?
(I do not have a Mac but I want to make a working package for Nixpkgs which compiles both on Linux and MacOS)
Saw that there was a hardcoded path added for gcc to the build steps for when building for MacOS in this commit:
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~arcachofo/simulide/trunk/revision/1158/SimulIDE.pro
Could I know why this was done? Did the program not work properly with clang?
(I do not have a Mac but I want to make a working package for Nixpkgs which compiles both on Linux and MacOS)
Quote from arcachofo on December 14, 2023, 9:16 pmThat is done because in Mac seems imposible to compile with gcc unless you force it this way.
SimulIDE is developed with gcc and does not compile in clang so easy.
That is done because in Mac seems imposible to compile with gcc unless you force it this way.
SimulIDE is developed with gcc and does not compile in clang so easy.
Quote from TomaSajt on December 14, 2023, 9:24 pmAnd just a slightly related question: does this run on anything other than the
x86
architecture?(this was probably answered somewhere on the website, sorry)
And just a slightly related question: does this run on anything other than the x86
architecture?
(this was probably answered somewhere on the website, sorry)
Quote from arcachofo on December 14, 2023, 9:46 pmAnd just a slightly related question: does this run on anything other than the
x86
architecture?Never tried to compile for any other architecture, but I guess it should be possible.
And just a slightly related question: does this run on anything other than the
x86
architecture?
Never tried to compile for any other architecture, but I guess it should be possible.
Quote from TomaSajt on December 14, 2023, 10:09 pmQuote from arcachofo on December 14, 2023, 9:46 pmAnd just a slightly related question: does this run on anything other than the
x86
architecture?Never tried to compile for any other architecture, but I guess it should be possible.
Okay, currently the automated builder of Nixpkgs fails for
aarch64-linux
here are the logs:
https://logs.ofborg.org/?key=nixos/nixpkgs.273641&attempt_id=7a8c7ec9-3504-424e-ac0d-a988d1e00688There's a lot of "undefined reference to assembler::" type errors.
No idea what causes it, but I don't really care for this version a lot anyways.
Quote from arcachofo on December 14, 2023, 9:46 pmAnd just a slightly related question: does this run on anything other than the
x86
architecture?Never tried to compile for any other architecture, but I guess it should be possible.
Okay, currently the automated builder of Nixpkgs fails for aarch64-linux
here are the logs:
https://logs.ofborg.org/?key=nixos/nixpkgs.273641&attempt_id=7a8c7ec9-3504-424e-ac0d-a988d1e00688
There's a lot of "undefined reference to assembler::" type errors.
No idea what causes it, but I don't really care for this version a lot anyways.
Quote from arcachofo on December 14, 2023, 10:13 pmI see... that is the JIT compiler for the script language.
It only works for x86.The JIT compiler could be deactivated but this is not a good thing.
I see... that is the JIT compiler for the script language.
It only works for x86.
The JIT compiler could be deactivated but this is not a good thing.